SOURCING OF COMPETENT AND NON-BIASED JUDICIAL ACTORS AND VENUES THAT SUSTAIN REASONABLE ACCESS AND CONTEMPORARY DETERMINATIONS OF ISSUES THROUGH PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS
"As the living embodiment ofthe Crown, Her Majesty unites Canadians ... New Canadians swear allegiance to The Queen, so do Members of Parliament and the Legislatures, military, judges; and police officers."
6. Canada's Governor General Reported The 3 Royal Report Citations To EIIR
1. Citizens Attain Faith In The Nation Through The Integrity Of The Head Of State
7. Canada's Parliamentary Statutory Legislation Is Law Through Royal Assent
2. British Colonizers Created "Take The Indian Out Of The Indian Child" Policies
8. International Law Defines The Head Of State As Being Sole Source Of Authority
3. Indigenous Peoples Were Prohibited From Retaining Lawyers Until Year 1960
9. EIIR Declares War Via Royal Prerogative / Doctrine Of Necessity + Royal Assent
4. HRH Dr S Hwuneem, LLB (Kwa'mutsun Nation) Installed A War Crimes Tribunal
5. Canada Parliament Accepted The Three Royal Reports That Cited 66 Genocides
10. Does EIIR Enjoy Absolute Prosecution For Crimes Immunity Is The Question?
BRILL : "The relationship between international crimes and sovereign immunities has bedevilled judicial practice and legal scholarship and created an apparently irreconcilable tension between the two notions. Part of the difficulty in addressing this tension derives from the approach to resolving it. This paper proposes a novel approach, viewing the relationship specifically from the perspective of international criminal law and looking at the three core functions of immunities in that context. The authors conclude that customary international law excludes immunities as defence or bar to jurisdiction for core international crimes regardless of the nature of the jurisdiction concerned, the position of the accused, or the capacity in which the accused acted. When interpreted within that framework, the ICC Statute provides for clear limitations to the role of immunities in ICC proceedings and avoids the pitfalls that have thus far marred the ICC’s approach to the law of immunities." Rule Of Law
QUESTION : Is There Any Reasonable Expectation In Law That A Head Of State - Who Has Accepted Genocide Charges Upon The State - Should Be Provided Absolute Immunity From Prosecution ? ANSWER :Not In A Free And Democratic Nation State Accepting Customary And International Law Jurisdiction. And, Certainly Not, Where The Foundational Oath Of Office Of Said Head Of State Specifically Provides The Duty Of Care Contrary To Such Exemptions : Any Such State Providing Such Exclusions Would Be Considered To Be A Failed State. Note The ICC Trigger MechanismETC
THESE IMAGES ARE LINKS TO ADDITIONAL REFERENCES - PLEASE - CLICK TO REVIEW
THESE IMAGES ARE LINKS TO ADDITIONAL REFERENCES - PLEASE - CLICK TO REVIEW
THESE IMAGES ARE LINKS TO ADDITIONAL REFERENCES - PLEASE - CLICK TO REVIEW
RESPECTFULLY PUBLISHED BY : R CHARLES GOODWIN : INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTIONS